USDA, Office of the Chief Economist
SpacerHomeAbout OCENewsroomHelpContact Us
U.S. Department of Agriculture Link
Search OCE
 
 
 
Search all USDA
 
  Advanced Search  
  Search Tips  
  Browse by Subject  
  Agricultural Labor  
  Commodity Forecasts  
  Climate Change  
  Renewable Energy  
  Risk Assessment  
  Sustainable Development  
  Weather and Climate  
Bottom Left Nav
     
Risk Assessment
Risk Forums
 

The Risk Forums, sponsored by the Office of the Chief Economist's Office of Risk Assessment and Cost Benefit Analysis and the Food Safety and Inspection Service's Risk Assessment Division, provide an opportunity for discussion of a broad range of policy-related scientific, and methodological issues concerning risk assessment. Forums are open to all public and private risk assessors.

Join the ORACBA mailing list and receive notice of all forums and the monthly ORACBA Risk News/Calendar. Join by sending an e-mail to Jennifer Lohr. In the Subject line enter "Mailing List" and be sure to include your phone number and e-mail address.

Content Divider
 

ORACBA Risk Forums

September 25, 2012
Science, Policy and Risk Forum
Estimation of cancer risks and benefits associated with a potential increased consumption of fruits and vegetables

Rick Reiss, Principal Scientist, Exponent
10:00 am – 11:30 am
Room 4433, South Building

Presented by: USDA Office of Risk Assessment and Cost-Benefit Analysis and the National Capital Area Chapter of the Society for Risk Analysis

Dr. Reiss is a principal scientist at Exponent.  He is an environmental health scientist with expertise in risk assessment, exposure assessment, environmental chemistry and fate, mathematical modeling, and applied statistics.
Dr. Oz video

April 05, 2011
Risk versus Hazard – Lessons from Europe

Ragnar Löfstedt, of King’s College of London

Professor Löfstedt is the author of ten books, over 90 peer-reviewed articles on risk communication and risk management. He is the editor-in-chief of the Journal of Risk Research, as well as on the editorial board of Risk Analysis and Risk Management.  He is a member of the European Food Safety Authority’s Advisory Group on Risk Communication.  Professor Löfstedt was awarded the Chauncey Starr Award by the Society for Risk Analysis in 2000 for exceptional contributions to the field of risk analysis for someone under forty years of age and in 2005 he was made a fellow of the Society for Risk Analysis.

Dec 03, 2010
Application of a multicriteria decision making model based on probabilistic inversion to assess nanotechnology-enabled food products

Villie Flari, Food and Environment Research Agency, United Kingdom
Rabin Nelso, University of Delft, the Netherlands

Nov 16, 2010
Moving beyond nanogeneralities -
Providing focus to nanopolicy progress

Richard Canady, International Life Sciences Institute Research Foundation
Steve Froggett, Expert Consultant, ICF International, Inc
Guillaume Gruere, International Food Policy
Research Institute

Mar 16, 2010
The EPA's Stochastic Human Exposure and Dose Simulation
(SHEDS) - Dietary Model

Valerie Zartarian, Ph.D. and Jianping Xue, M.D., M.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Exposure Research Laboratory, Human Exposure and Atmospheric Sciences Division, Exposure Modeling Research Branch

Oct 07, 2009
Risk Analysis for Nanotechnology:
State of the Science and Implications
Jo Anne Shatkin, Ph.D.
Managing Director
CLF Ventures, Inc.
Boston, Massachusetts

 

Nov 12, 2008
State-of-the-Science Workshop Report: Issues and
Approaches in Low Dose-Response Extrapolation
for Environmental Health Risk Assessment

Ronald H. White, Ila Cote, Lauren Zeise, Mary Fox, Francesca
Dominici, Thomas A. Burke, Paul D. White, Dale B. Hattis and
Jonathan M. Samet
Presenter: Mary Fox

May 13, 2008
Agrifood Nanotechnology: Upstream Assessment of Risk and Oversight

Prof. Jennifer Kuzma
Center for Science, Technology, and Public Policy
Humphrey Institute, University of Minnesota

 

 
Content Divider
 

2007 Forums

Nov 19, 2007
Dietary Exposure Assessment at the Food and Drug Administration: A comparison of exposure assessment methods used in the Total Diet Study and analyses of individual food products

Dr. Michael DiNovi and Katie Egan
U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition

For over forty years, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has conducted the Total Diet Study to monitor levels of pesticide residues, chemical contaminants, metals, radionuclides and other substances in food. The results of this monitoring program are used to estimate dietary exposure to these substances by the U.S. population. The FDA also collects samples of individual foods, outside of the Total Diet Study sampling protocol, in response to emerging food safety issues. Two recent efforts to sample individual foods addressed acrylamide and perchlorate levels in certain types of foods. Results from individual food samples are also used to estimate dietary exposure.

This Risk Forum will compare and contrast the dietary exposure techniques used by the FDA for the Total Diet Study with the exposure assessment techniques used with individual food sampling. The role of food recipes and food consumption surveys, such as the Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals (CSFII) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), in the dietary assessment will be discussed. The use of probabilistic models in dietary exposure assessments, such as the Environ Dietary Exposure Assessment (EDEA,) will also be addressed. Finally, interpretation of the results of these two different dietary exposure assessments will be examined.

Nov. 13, 2007
Are interdisciplinary approaches of any use to economists and risk assessors?
A survey of recent interdisciplinary research efforts at the National Science Foundation

Dr. Robert OConnor
National Science Foundation
Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences

Come explore the use of interdisciplinary approaches to increase the understanding and effectiveness of decision making by individuals, groups, organizations, and society and explore whether interdisciplinary approaches are of use to economists or risk assessors. Dr. O'Connor will describe research funded by the Decision, Risk and Management Sciences program and by special interdisciplinary competitions at the National Science Foundation, as well as discuss future applications of interdisciplinary approaches for solving problems that involve risk.

Oct 16, 2007 Spring Valley Public Health Scoping Study
Legacy of US WWI Chemical Weapons Research: Case-Study of Environmental Epidemiology, Risk and Community Health Assessment in Washington, DC

Dr. Mary Fox
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Chemical warfare research, testing, and disposal were conducted during and immediately after World War I on the American University Campus and surrounding areas now known as the Spring Valley neighborhood of Washington, DC. In 1993, a contractor unearthed buried military ordnance. Subsequent investigations revealed disposal pits containing laboratory materials; chemical weapons agent and degradates; and surface soil with elevated arsenic concentrations. Remediation of soil arsenic is underway and exposure and health investigations have been conducted.

Community health concerns remain. An environmental health scoping study was conducted to: (1) Describe community health in Spring Valley; (2) Identify health risks of past and present activities; (3) Identify gaps in the existing health and environmental information; and (4) Recommend studies to fill remaining gaps. Results of the analysis comprising community health and risk assessments, and spatial analysis of exposure and health outcomes will be presented.

Content Divider
 

2006 Forums

ORACBA Risk Forum, GeoSTAC (GeoSpatial Tools and Access): a new GIS tool to assist risk assessments
Scott Jackson, Ph.D.
Principal Scientist, Risk Assessment
BASF and Chairman, CropLife America
Environmental Risk Assessment Committee

On behalf of the CropLife America Environmental Exposure Modeling Workgroup Dr. Jackson demontrated the use of GeoSTAC, a new GIS tool for ARCGIS applications created to assemble and display data critical to risk assessors. Dr. Jackson’s presentation provided a brief overview of the use of GIS and its role in pesticide risk assessments and risk communication. GeoSTAC includes three new tools that can be added into ARCGIS to easily join tables to geospatial data, extract features and attributes from several sources and aggregate and summarize the data to graphically depict results to decision makers. While GeoSTAC does not perform risk assessments directly, it assembles the information necessary for a risk assessment in an easily assessable format.  Dr. Jackson demonstrated the use of the tool to refine the geographic area analyzed in an ecological risk assessment of the use of a pesticide in a region where there is an endangered species present.

January
Environmental Benefits of Conservation Buffers
Dr. Richard Lowrance
USDA-ARS Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory
Dr. Lowrance discussed the environmental benefits of conservation buffers and wetlands. He presented empirical
data on the effect of buffers on reducing runoff volume and nutrients. He will discussed the use of the Riparian Ecosystem Management Model (REMM) to simulate the effect of riparian buffers. Dr. Lowrance is an ecologist at the Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory in Tifton, GA. His research focuses on measuring and predicting the water quality
impacts of best management practices and conservation buffers in fields, farms and watersheds. 

Content Divider
 

2005 Forums

September
Focusing on the Risk Decision: Improving Communication between Risk Assessors, Risk Managers, and Research Scientists
Dr. Warner North, President and Principal Scientist
NorthWorks, Inc.

March
BMP Evaluations Using SWAT Model and Associated Uncertainties
Dr. Adel Shirmohammadi
Biological Resources Engineering Department
University of Maryland
College Park, MD
Dr. Shirmohammadi and his research associate, Dr. Chu, presented the results of a simulation study investigating the placement of non-structural best management practices (BMPs) in a small agricultural watershed in the Piedmont region of Maryland. The presentation covered calibration, validation and application of the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in Maryland's Monocacy River. Ten years of monitoring data on hydrology and water quality in the Monocacy River were used to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the SWAT model. Results of simulations assessing several non-structural BMP's and thi=eir impact on nutrient discharge reduction were presented. A unique aspect of this modeling effort is the use of a Monte Carlo Latin Hypercube Sampling technique in combination with SWAT. The presentation discussed the use of probabilistic techniques in interpreting the uncertainties involved in the SWAT model's output and its implications.

   
 
Last Modified: 09/26/2012
 
Related Topics
Bullet
Risk Calendar
Bullet
Risk Forum
Bullet
Activities
Bullet
Reports/Papers
Bullet
Resources
 End right navigation
 
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
           
 
Left corner
OCE Home | USDA.gov | Policies and Links
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House