Federal Trade Commission
Protecting America's Consumers
Docket No. 9300
In the Matter of Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V.,
Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, and Pitt-Des Moines, Inc.
November 28, 2008
- Commission Letter Approving the Proposed Divestiture of Assets to Matrix Service Company and Extending the Monitor Trustee for an Additional Two Years
- Commission Letter to Commenter Hohrein
- News Release
September 16, 2008
- Application for Approval of Divestiture (Public Record Version)
- Exhibit F
- Exhibit G
- News Release
January 25, 2008
- Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Denying the Petition for Review of the Final Order of the Federal Trade Commission, and Thereby Sustaining the Divestiture and Other Requirements of the Final Order
- News Release
August 21, 2006
- Brief of Respondent Federal Trade Commission, Filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in Chicago Bridge & Iron Company N.V., et al., v. Federal Trade Commission, Docket No. 05-60192, On Petition for Review of A Final Order of the Federal Trade Commission.
February 21, 2006
- Respondents' Motion for Extension of in Camera Treatment of Material Previously Afforded Such Treatment
August 30, 2005
- Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Respondents' Petition for Reconsideration of the Final Order [Public Record Version]
- Order Clarifying Respondents' Obligations As To The Pitt-Des Moines and CB&I Corporate Names
August 24, 2005
- Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Respondents' Motion For In Camera Treatment of Material
Previously Designated As Confidential [Portions of Complaint Counsel's Response to CB&I Respondents'
Further Briefing on Specific Remedy Issues] [Public Record Version]
- Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Respondents' Motion For In Camera Treatment of Material
Previously Designated As Confidential [Portions of Respondents' Further Briefing on Specific Remedy Issues]
July 21, 2005
- Respondents' Motion for in Camera Treatment of Material Previously Designated as Confidential in Respondents' Further Briefing on Specific Remedy Issues
July 20, 2005
- Order Approving Respondents' Application for Approval of Monitor Trustee and Monitor Trustee Agreement
July 5, 2005
- Complaint Counsel's Response to Respondents' Motion for in Camera Treatment
June 30, 2005
- Respondents' Motion for in Camera Treatment of Material Previously Designated as Confidential
June 20, 2005
- Complaint Counsel's Response to CB&I Respondents' Further Briefing on Specific Remedy Issues [PDF 15.85K]
June 13, 2005
- Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. Supplemental Briefing on Complaint Counsel's Motion for Clarification
June 6, 2005
- Respondents' Further Briefing on Specific Remedy Issues [PDF 424K]
June 3, 2005
- Complaint Counsel's Response to CB&I Respondents' Application for Approval of Proposed Monitor Trustee and Monitor Trustee Agreement [PDF 99K]
May 25, 2005
- Order Granting Motion to Extend Time For Further Briefing On Specific Remedy Issues
May 20, 2005
- Complaint Counsel's Response to Respondents' Motion to Extend Time for Further Briefing on Specific Remedy Issues [PDF 41K]
May 19, 2005
- Respondents' Motion to Extend Time for Further Briefing on Specific Remedy Issues [PDF 28K]
May 10, 2005
- Commission Decision and Order Partially Denying Respondents' Petition for Reconsideration and Directing Further Briefing On Specific Remedy Issues
May 9, 2005
- Commission Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Respondents' Motion for In Camera Treatment of Material Previously Designated As Confidential
May 5, 2005
- Complaint Counsel's Response to Respondents' Motion for in Camera Treatment [PDF 99K]
April 11, 2005
- Complaint Counsel's Response to Pitt-des Moines' Briefing on Complaint Counsel's Motion for Clarification [PDF 92K]
April 7, 2005
- Pitt-des Moines, Inc. Briefing on Complaint Counsel's Motion for Clarification [PDF 775K]
April 6, 2005
- Complaint Counsel's Response to CB&I’s Further Briefing on Complaint Counsel's Motion for Clarification [PDF 330K]
March 28, 2005
- Respondents' Further Briefing on Complaint Counsel's Motion for Clarification [PDF 236K]
March 23, 2005
- Letter Filed by Duane M. Kelley, Jeffery A. Leon, Gregory J. Miarecki, Andrew Shapiro, Lance W. Lange, David E. Dahlquist, Ms. Danielle A. R. Coffman, Michael Mayer, Christopher B. Essig, James Herbison and Ms. Nada Sulaiman, Esqs. of Winston & Strawn Withdrawing Their Appearance [PDF 38K]
March 17, 2005
- Petition for Review in Chicago Bridge & Iron Company v. Federal Trade Commission [PDF 266K]
March 15, 2005
- Order Granting CB&I's Motion for Clarification; Denying as Moot CB&I's Motion for Stay; Directing Further Briefing on Complaint Counsel's Motion for Clarification; and Denying as Moot CB&I's Request to Toll the Time Period For Filing Petition for Review [PDF 273K]
February 28, 2005
- Respondents' Motion for in Camera Treatment of Material Previously Designated as Confidential (Corrected) [PDF 485K]
February 24, 2005
- Complaint Counsel’s Response to Respondents’ Motion for in Camera Treatment [PDF 10K]
February 22, 2005
- Respondents' Motion for In Camera Treatment of Material Previously Designated as Confidential [PDF 66K]
February 16, 2005
- Complaint Counsel's Response to Respondents' Supplement to Petition to Reconsider [PDF 161K]
February 14, 2005
- Respondents' Supplement to Petition to Reconsider the Opinion and Order in Light of Entry after the Close of the Record and Overbreadth [PDF 331K]
February 11, 2005
- Complaint Counsel's Opposition to Respondents' Petition to Reconsider [PDF 72K]
February 10, 2005
- Response to Complaint Counsel's Petition for Reconsideration to Clarify Respondents' Obligations as to the Pitt-des Moines and CB&I Corporate Names [PDF 26K]
February 7, 2005
- Complaint Counsel’s Answer to Respondents’ Motion for Clarification Or, in the Alternative, for a Stay [PDF 18k]
February 2, 2005
- Respondents' Notice of Appearance [PDF 189K]
February 1, 2005
- Respondents' Motion for Clarification Or, in the Alternative, for a Stay [PDF 834K]
- Petition to Reconsider the Opinion and Order in Light of Entry after the Close of the Record and Overbreadth [PDF 7.9M]
January 31, 2005
- Petition for Reconsideration to Clarify Respondents’ Obligations as to the Pitt-des Moines and CB&I Corporate Names [PDF 21K]
January 6, 2005
- Opinion of the Commission by Commissioner Orson Swindle [Public Record Version] [PDF 267K]
- Final Order of the Commission [PDF 37K]
- News Release
January 2, 2004
- Order Accepting Consent Agreement for Public Comment and Issuing Interim Consent Order
- Agreement Containing Consent Order
- Interim Consent Order
December 11, 2003
- Joint Motion to Accept Interim Consent Order, Interim Consent Order, and Agreement Containing Consent Order [PDF 227K]
December 5, 2003
- Order Prescribing Deadline for Filing Answer to Complaint Counsel's Emergency Motion [PDF 44K]
- Complaint Counsel’s Emergency Motion for Authorization to Seek Injunctive Relief to Preserve Provo
Fabrication Plant as a Going Concern Pending Completion of Administrative Litigation [PDF 26K]
October 24, 2003
- Reply Brief of Counsel Supporting the Complaint [PDF 192K]
October 21, 2003
- Notice Scheduling Oral Argument [PDF 38K]
October 17, 2003
- Respondents' Reply and Cross-Appeal Response Brief [PDF 3.2M]
September 16, 2003
- Answering and Cross-Appeal Brief of Counsel Supporting the Complaint [PDF 307K]
August 8, 2003
- Respondents' Appeal Brief [PDF 171KB]
July 10, 2003
- Complaint Counsel's Response to Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time [PDF 87KB]
July 2, 2003
- Respondents' Motion for Extension of Time to File Appeal Brief [PDF 151KB]
- Respondents' Notice of Appeal [PDF 51KB]
June 27, 2003
- Text of Public Version of Initial Decision by Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell
[PDF 10M] - Notice of Appeal by Complaint Counsel [PDF 6KB]
June 12, 2003
- Administrative Law Judge's Order Granting Respondents' Motion to Strike [PDF 133KB]
April 24, 2003
- Order Extending Time to File Initial Decision [PDF 7KB]
April 16, 2003
March 27, 2003
March 25, 2003
- Complaint Counsel’s Corrected Responses To Respondents’ Proposed Findings Of Fact And Conclusions Of Law [PDF 1.4M]
March 19, 2003
- Complaint Counsel’s Opposition To Respondents’ Motion To Strike Proposed Findings Of Fact [PDF 128KB]
- Respondents' Corrected Post Trial Reply Brief [PDF 394KB]
March 18, 2003
-
Respondents' Post-Trial Reply Brief and Memorandum in Support of Their Motion to Strike [PDF 228KB]
March 14, 2003
- Complaint Counsel's Corrected Reply Brief [PDF 1.7M]
March 7, 2003
- Respondents' Motion To Strike [PDF 15KB]
February 25, 2003
- Complaint Counsel’s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law [PDF 528KB]
- Complaint Counsel’s Corrected Brief in Support of its Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law [PDF 205KB]
- Attachment A [PDF 33KB]
January 28, 2003
- Administrative Law Judge's Order on Respondents' Motion to Strike Trial Testimony [PDF 178KB]
- Administrative Law Judge's Order on Respondents' Motion for Directed Verdict on the Issue of Remedy [PDF 77KB]
- Complaint Counsel’s Opposition to Respondents’ Motion for Leave to File Reply [PDF 12KB]
January 23, 2003
- Complaint Counsel’s Opposition to Respondents’ Motion for Directed Verdict on the Issue of Remedy [PDF 90KB]
January 15, 2003
- Complaint Counsel’s Opposition to Respondents’ Motion to Strike Impeachment of Dr. Barry Harris [PDF 20KB]
January 13, 2003
- Respondents' Motion for Directed Verdict on the Issue of Remedy [PDF 47KB]
- Respondents’ Motion to Strike Trial Testimony Relating to Exhibits CX 1577 and CX 1578 [PDF 10KB]
- Proposed Order [PDF 8KB]
January 8, 2003
- Complaint Counsel's Opposition to Respondents' Motion to Withdraw Stipulated Documents From Evidence [PDF 663KB]
- ALJ Order Granting Respondents' Motions for In Camera Treatment [PDF 73KB]
- Complaint Counsel’s Opposition to Respondents’ Motion to Withdraw Stipulated Documents From Evidence [PDF 32KB]
December 31, 2002
- Respondents' Motion to Withdraw Inadvertently Stipulated Documents From Evidence [PDF 27KB]
December 20, 2002
- Respondents' Opposition to Complaint Counsel's Motion for Leave to Depose Mr. Jeane-Pierre Jolly for Good Cause [PDF 968KB]
- Respondents' Motion for In Camera Treatment of Certain Trial Testimony [PDF 298KB]
December 17, 2002
- ALJ Order Granting Joint Motion for Further Extension of the One Year Decision Rule [PDF 82KB]
December 13, 2002
- Non-party Witness' Response to Complaint Counsel's Motion for Leave to Depose Mr. Jeane-Pierre Jolly [PDF 156KB]
- ALJ Order on Boeing's Motions for in Camera Treatment of Trial Testimony of Greg Proulx and Trial Exhibit [PDF 29KB]
- ALJ Order on MG Industries' Motion for in Camera Treatment of Trial Testimony of Michael Patterson and Trial Exhibit [PDF 69KB]
December 9, 2002
- Complaint Counsel's Motion For Leave To Depose Mr. Jean-Pierre Jolly For Good Cause [PDF 1.2M]
December 3, 2002
- Order Granting Respondent's Renewed Motion for In Camera Treatment of Certain Exhibits [PDF 424KB]
- Respondents' Notice of Withdrawal of its Motion to Call Certain Witnesses by Deposition [PDF 425KB
November 22, 2002
- ALJ's Order on Respondent's Application for Issuance of Subpoenas [PDF 35KB]
November 20, 2002
- Respondents' Motion to Strike Dr. Simpson's Opinion Regarding Efficiencies [PDF 391KB]
November 14, 2002
- ALJ’s Order on Nonparties' Renewed Motions for In Camera Treatment of Documents Listed on Parties' Exhibit Lists [PDF 57KB]
November 13, 2002
- Motion for In Camera Treatment of Trial Testimony of David Kamrath [PDF 20KB]
November 12, 2002
- Notice of Appearance Filed by Jeffrey Spigel and Kathryn Walsh of King & Spalding, Counsel for Third Party Project Technical Liaison Assocs., Inc. and Third Party's Unopposed Motion for In Camera Treatment of Designated Deposition Testimony [PDF 60KB]
- Declaration of Mark Richard [PDF 78KB]
November 8, 2002
- Complaint Counsel's Opposition to Respondents' Motion to Strike Dr. Simpson's Opinion Regarding Efficiencies [PDF 124KB]
November 7, 2002
- Respondents' Notice of Withdrawal of its Motion to Call Certain Witnesses by Deposition [PDF 80KB]
November 6, 2002
- Notice of Appearance Filed by Duane Kelly [PDF 70KB]
November 5, 2002
- Respondents' Pre-Trial Brief [PDF 3719KB]
- Complaint Counsel's Opposition to Respondents' Motion to Call Certain Witnesses by Deposition [PDF 156KB]
November 1, 2002
- Administrative Law Judge’s Order on Non-parties' Motions for In Camera Treatment of Documents Listed on Parties' Exhibit Lists [PDF 363KB]
October 29, 2002
- Notice of Appearance Filed by Robert A. Lipstein, Esq. [PDF 8KB]
October 28, 2002
- ALJ Order on Application for Issuance of Subpoenas[PDF 42KB]
October 25, 2002
- Notice of Appearance Filed by Morris Bloom, Robert Tovsky, April Tabor and Eric Sprague, etc. [PDF 63KB]
October 23, 2002
- ALJ's Order on Respondent's Motion to Strike Witnesses [PDF 239KB]
October 22, 2002
- Notice of Appearance Filed by J. Robertson and Chul Pak, Counsel Supporting the Complaint for the Federal Trade Commission [PDF 53KB]
October 21, 2002
- Complaint Counsel's Pre-trial Brief [PDF 269KB]
October 16, 2002
- Zachry Construction Corporation's Supplemental Motion for In-Camera Treatment of Confidential Testimony and Materials [PDF 268KB]
- Administrative Law Judge Order Granting Respondents' Motion to Modify Witness List [PDF 145KB]
October 15, 2002
- Administrative Law Judge Order Denying Motion to Compel [PDF 98KB]
- Agreed Motion for In Camera Treatment of Pat Outtrim's Deposition Testimony and Agreed Order for In Camera Treatment of Pat Outtrim's Desposition Testimony [PDF 251KB]
October 8, 2002
- Respondents' Motion for Leave to Modify Their Witness List [PDF 460KB]
October 7, 2002
- Complaint Counsel’s Opposition to Respondents’ Motion for Leave to Add Unidentified Expert Witness [PDF 14KB]
October 4, 2002
- Complaint Counsel’s Opposition to Respondents’ Motion to Strike [PDF 44KB]
July 1, 2002
- Respondent's Motion for Extension of Time [PDF 6KB]
June 18, 2002
- Proposed Second Revised Scheduling Order [PDF 42KB]
- Order Extending Time for Filing Initial Decision and Granting Respondent's Motion for a Sixty-Day Extension of Time [PDF 21KB]
- Complaint Counsel's Response to Respondent's Motion for a Sixty-Day Extension of Time [PDF 121KB]
May 6, 2002
- Joint Motion for Entering of First Revised Scheduling Order [PDF 118KB]
- First Revised Scheduling Order [PDF 44KB]
May 5, 2002
- Notice of Appearance Filed by Rhett R. Krulla, Steven L. Wilensky, Cecelia M. Waldeck, Michael A. Franchak, Lisa A. Rosenthal, and Hector R. Ruiz, Jr., Counsel Supporting the Complaint for the Federal Trade Commission [PDF 22KB]
April 19, 2002
- Order Denying Respondents' Motion for Issuance of Subpoenas [PDF 110KB]
April 10, 2002
- Respondents Motion for Leave to Seek Foreign Evidence [PDF 127KB]
March 4, 2002
- Motion for Entering of Protective Order [PDF 341KB]
February 12, 2002
- Administrative Law Judge Order on Prehearing Conference [PDF 11KB]
February 2, 2002
- Chicago Bridge & Iron N.V.'s Answer to Complaint - Public [PDF 425KB]
- Notice of Apperance filed by Duane M. Kelley etc... [PDF 15KB]
January 31, 2002
- Notice of Apperance filed by Rhett Kulla etc... [PDF 12KB]
January 4, 2002
- Third Order extending time to File Answers [PDF 13KB]
November 16, 2001
- Order Extending Time to File Answers [PDF 53KB]
October 25, 2001
- Order Designating Administrative Law Judge [PDF 9.23KB]